|
Re: retrogradacja a pytanie 13 lat(a), 1 MiesiÄ…c temu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: retrogradacja a pytanie 13 lat(a), 1 MiesiÄ…c temu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ostatnio zmieniany: 2012/03/14 20:03 Przez jagna108.
|
|
|
Re: retrogradacja a pytanie 13 lat(a), 1 MiesiÄ…c temu
|
|
ciekawa dyskusja na temat recepcji w przypadku przenoszenia swiatla:
www.skyscript.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php...7562d45f2e467ac0b6f7
Certainly with Lilly?s text it seems we can have 3 levels of translation ? without reception, with reception, with mutual reception. The first being the most fragile; the last the most reliable.
There?s an important section leading up to and on pages 185-186 which is worth reading carefully. Lilly describes how, when a planet is receiving the influence of another, there is a willingness to co-operate that facilitates easy agreement. It doesn?t remove any difficulties and strains but it adds a level of determination to persist through the difficulties; hence some matters will go on to reach fulfilment with reception where without it the situation would have been considered too troublesome. I suppose that?s why some authors claim that translation really needs reception to be reliable.
In his comment on translation on p.186 Lilly is assuming that the planet being applied to is receiving the applying planet where he writes:
Quote:
?If any planet translates the light or virtue betwixt one significator and another, and he to whom the light is translated be an infortune, and impedited, the question or matter is destroyed; unless the Infortune be again received.?
Meaning that even with reception, translation can be damaged if the receiving planet is unfortunate, unless mutual reception exists.
Similarly, in his definition of collection on p.126 he says that both of the planets applying to the collecting planet need to receive it into their dignities. Yet elsewhere, for example p.225, he talks of collection without any reference to reception and on p.186 he says that if the collecting planet is destructive or unfortunate, we can only expect the matter to be accomplished if the collecting planet receives both of the applying planets into its dignities.
So whilst we can accept translation and collection without reception, reception helps to secure it, and mutual reception almost guarantees it. |
|
|
|
"Take nothing on trust, see everything for yourself"
|
|
|
Re: retrogradacja a pytanie 13 lat(a), 1 MiesiÄ…c temu
|
|
|
Recepcja jest od saturna,saturn jest w baranie i bardzo jest ku niemu.
Nie rozumiem /
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: retrogradacja a pytanie 13 lat(a), 1 MiesiÄ…c temu
|
|
|
Certainly with Lilly?s text it seems we can have 3 levels of translation ? without reception, with reception, with mutual reception. The first being the most fragile; the last the most reliable.
<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: retrogradacja a pytanie 13 lat(a), 1 MiesiÄ…c temu
|
|
|
Recepcja jest od saturna,saturn jest w baranie i bardzo jest ku niemu.
Nie rozumiem /<
|
|
|
|
Ostatnio zmieniany: 2012/03/14 19:05 Przez jagna108.
|
|
|
Re: retrogradacja a pytanie 13 lat(a), 1 MiesiÄ…c temu
|
|
|
Certainly with Lilly?s text it seems we can have 3 levels of translation ? without reception, with reception, with mutual reception. The first being the most fragile; the last the most reliable.
A jak Ci sie to sprawdza na przykladach z zycia?
|
|
|
|
"Take nothing on trust, see everything for yourself"
|
|
|
